When one basket of stocks pays a 2 percent dividend yield, and another, seemingly very similar one pays 6 percent, which one do you want to own? In today’s one percent bond yield world, it’s not a hypothetical question. Two popular ETFs, both comprised of some of the world’s best known companies, present this puzzle. Let’s sort it out.
SPY is State Street’s S&P 500 index ETF and VGK is Vanguard’s European index ETF. Both hold hundreds of stocks and have razor thin management costs: 9 basis points for SPY and 14 for VGK. Almost nothing.
The stocks they contain are literally household names – the biggest US- and European-based companies, true global competitors. You can be sure that Exxon Mobil and BP are always squaring off for the best oil and gas deals, and that Pfizer and Sanofi and Roche are doing the same in pharmaceuticals.
With similar contents, the dividend yields seem to be from completely different planets. SPY yields 2.01 percent as of this writing and VGK 6.33 percent (source: Yahoo Finance).
All other things being equal, that 6 percent yield makes VGK much more desirable. But other things are rarely equal, and they’re definitely not in this case.
The obvious difference is geography. With VGK holdings all based in Europe, they are more susceptible to the uncertain future of the euro and any real or rumored national defaults. Further, the results for any US investor buying VGK will be filtered through ever-changing exchange rates for the dollar versus the pound, euro, and Swiss franc. (See “Ignore currencies at your peril”)
The companies in VGK also face different political environments, toil in different central bank territories, and pay different tax rates than their US counterparts.
Six percent, but at what cost?
So the big dividend gap…does it make sense? We can’t answer that, but we can tell you that VGK is up 7.75 percent over the last 12 months. SPY is up 22.6 percent (source: Google Finance). Maybe European companies are selling at some kind of a “fear discount” that investors demand for stomaching the extra uncertainty hanging over Europe these days. Viewed another way, the big yield may be a “fear premium,” a reward for the extra risk.
Our point is not to anoint one of these ETFs the winner. We just want to draw attention to the many other things not being equal in any comparison of different securities. Before you leap for something you like, such as a big yield, make sure you understand there are other variables that come with the package.
As for that free lunch? We’re still on the lookout.
This communication may include forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements (including words such as “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” and “expect”). Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Various factors could cause actual results or performance to differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements.”
“Historical performance is not indicative of future results. The investment return will fluctuate with market conditions.
Past performance is not indicative of any specific investment or future results. Views regarding the economy, securities markets or other specialized areas, like all predictors of future events, cannot be guaranteed to be accurate and may result in economic loss to the investor.
Investment strategies, philosophies, allocations and holdings are subject to change without prior notice.
This communication is intended to provide general information only and should not be construed as an offer of specifically tailored individualized advice.
While the Adviser believes the outside data sources cited to be credible, it has not independently verified the correctness of any of their inputs or calculations and, therefore, does not warranty the accuracy of any third-party sources or information.
Adviser does not endorse the statements, services or performance of any third-party vendor.
Unless stated otherwise, any mention of specific securities or investments is for hypothetical and illustrative purposes only. Adviser’s clients may or may not hold the securities discussed in their portfolios. Adviser makes no representations that any of the securities discussed have been or will be profitable.
Any IPO alerts are purely informational and should not be construed as recommendations to invest.
Adviser is not licensed to provide and does not provide legal, tax or accounting advice to clients. Advice of qualified counsel or accountant should be sought to address any specific situation requiring assistance from such licensed individuals.
Any case studies or hypothetical client profiles are for demonstration purposes only. They illustrate the breadth and depth of the many clients we represent at various life stages. Any similarities to actual Adviser’s clients past or present are strictly coincidental. Individual advice and results will vary based on each client’s circumstances, objectives and prevailing economic conditions.