Certain investors and investments take on a mystical aura from time to time. That’s certainly the case today with John Paulson and gold. Paulson is currently the largest holder of gold in ETF form, possessing more than $4 billion of the popular gold SPDR (symbol GLD) through his various hedge funds, and it has brought him great riches.
Paulson is purported to have made billion in 2010, on top of the $3.7 billion he made in 2007, betting against subprime mortgages. It seems everything he touches turns to gold. Including gold.
It would be easy to take this information and head straight for the GLD trading window. But basing investment decisions on mystical (some would say mythical) auras doesn’t always pay off. Gold seems to many like a sure bet these days, having blasted from $300 an ounce in 2000 to more than $1300 in 2011, far outperforming major stock indices.
But it has not always been so.
As shown above, from 1980 to 2000 the price of gold barely budged, and lost considerable value over those twenty long years when adjusted for inflation. Following the dot-com bubble and 9/11, the precious metal gained immediate favor as a haven from crisis, a reputation that remains today, even though the dramatic regime change in Egypt failed to significantly move gold’s price.
Gold for everyone
While future gold prices will always be a matter for debate, it is undeniable that gold indexing has quickly matured. GLD is all grown up. Launched in 2004, the ETF is one of the largest in the world, with more than $50 billion in assets. In fact, GLD is now the sixth largest holder of gold, trailing only the US, Germany, the IMF, Italy, and France.
The fund has democratized the ownership of gold in many ways, allowing investors of limited means to own the metal without the need for a physical vault or insurance for gold bars or coins. GLD has truly changed the world of gold.
So where does gold go next? $1800 or $800? Is it a buy or a sell? Many would ask WWPD – What would Paulson do? I would not. As a hedge fund manager he could be hedging his position (shorting) gold in the futures market. Or he could be shorting other gold related securities, none of which he is required to report. He is about as far away from an individual investor trying to build financial security as one can get. I don’t recommend using him for direction.
In my view, gold’s real value is simply that it doesn’t behave like stocks. Stocks are valued based on future earnings and dividends. Gold doesn’t have an internal rate of return like a company. It doesn’t pay a dividend. It doesn’t pay interest. It is valuable because it is scarce, and because people perceive it as a desirable alternative to stocks, especially in a turbulent economy.
Gold’s price is not directly determined by how much comes out of the ground each year, but by the most basic market mechanism – at what price will a buyer and seller freely arrive. If its price moved in concert with stock prices, there would be no reason to buy gold. But it doesn’t. As this chart depicts, since its inception GLD has struck it own (highly profitable) course, while the Dow and S&P have tracked so closely they can barely be discerned as two separate lines. This pattern may continue, or may reverse. No one can know which.
The availability of asset classes that move independently from one another (in math lingo: are not correlated) creates the opportunity to shape the expected risk and return of the overall portfolio by adjusting allocations. That’s how we see gold working in a portfolio – not as a dominant holding, but as an ingredient in a recipe that connects overall portfolio risk and return, and preserves capital when other asset classes may flounder.
This communication may include forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements (including words such as “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” and “expect”). Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Various factors could cause actual results or performance to differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements.”
“Historical performance is not indicative of future results. The investment return will fluctuate with market conditions.
Past performance is not indicative of any specific investment or future results. Views regarding the economy, securities markets or other specialized areas, like all predictors of future events, cannot be guaranteed to be accurate and may result in economic loss to the investor.
Investment strategies, philosophies, allocations and holdings are subject to change without prior notice.
This communication is intended to provide general information only and should not be construed as an offer of specifically tailored individualized advice.
While the Adviser believes the outside data sources cited to be credible, it has not independently verified the correctness of any of their inputs or calculations and, therefore, does not warranty the accuracy of any third-party sources or information.
Adviser does not endorse the statements, services or performance of any third-party vendor.
Unless stated otherwise, any mention of specific securities or investments is for hypothetical and illustrative purposes only. Adviser’s clients may or may not hold the securities discussed in their portfolios. Adviser makes no representations that any of the securities discussed have been or will be profitable.
Any IPO alerts are purely informational and should not be construed as recommendations to invest.
Adviser is not licensed to provide and does not provide legal, tax or accounting advice to clients. Advice of qualified counsel or accountant should be sought to address any specific situation requiring assistance from such licensed individuals.
Any case studies or hypothetical client profiles are for demonstration purposes only. They illustrate the breadth and depth of the many clients we represent at various life stages. Any similarities to actual Adviser’s clients past or present are strictly coincidental. Individual advice and results will vary based on each client’s circumstances, objectives and prevailing economic conditions.