Tales of Wall Street greed and grifting are as old as the Buttonwood Tree itself. Outrage continues to flare over reckless borrowing, insider trading, and elaborate Ponzi schemes, not to mention stupendous pay packages for executives who created investment products that nearly destroyed our financial systems. But here’s one tale of greed that never was, the story of an investing powerhouse that doesn’t even seek a profit. Listen in…
I mentioned Vanguard recently as the gorilla that grew to 800 pounds through low fees and respected index investment products. But there’s more to that story. Vanguard was built from day one on a greed-free corporate structure, about as far from the traditional Wall Street profit model as you can get.
Vanguard is owned 100% by the Vanguard funds, which are 100% owned by fund investors – the clients. That’s right, the business is owned by clients, not by a huge holding company, nor a billionaire entrepreneur, nor external shareholders with expectations for growth and dividends. See how Vanguard’s CEO describes the business.
We expect that Vanguard’s 12,500 employees – the teams that manage its mutual funds and ETFs and provide customer service – are compensated fairly. We assume the company spends millions to stay at the forefront of technology. But by not spending as much as its competitors in other areas (the company has just three domestic offices and doesn’t pay commissions to salespeople like American Funds), and by not paying a dividend, expenses stay very very low, averaging just 23 basis points in 2009. With investors paying more attention to fees recently, Vanguard’s low expenses may induce others to cut fees as well.
Even with its low expense ratio and greed-free approach, the company generates a healthy revenue stream. At 23 basis points on $1.6 trillion, we estimate annual revenue at $3.7 billion. It’s the largest mutual fund company in the world, yet it has reached this lofty position quietly and, notably, without bailouts.
Because of its unique ownership model, it’s difficult to compare Vanguard with any other investment firm. Companies like Merrill Lynch must spend aggressively on salespeople and commissions to attract new clients, support growth and increase profitability, which in turn drives up the stock price and allows a higher dividend. Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs paid out 39% of its revenue in compensation, more than $430,000 per employee, a number that is remarkable or sickening, depending on your viewpoint.
The Vanguard ownership model exists nowhere else on Wall Street. In my opinion, Vanguard will continue to thrive because of its cost advantage and refreshing business model. Growth without greed. Amazing, but true!
This communication may include forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements (including words such as “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” and “expect”). Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Various factors could cause actual results or performance to differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements.”
“Historical performance is not indicative of future results. The investment return will fluctuate with market conditions.
Past performance is not indicative of any specific investment or future results. Views regarding the economy, securities markets or other specialized areas, like all predictors of future events, cannot be guaranteed to be accurate and may result in economic loss to the investor.
Investment strategies, philosophies, allocations and holdings are subject to change without prior notice.
This communication is intended to provide general information only and should not be construed as an offer of specifically tailored individualized advice.
While the Adviser believes the outside data sources cited to be credible, it has not independently verified the correctness of any of their inputs or calculations and, therefore, does not warranty the accuracy of any third-party sources or information.
Adviser does not endorse the statements, services or performance of any third-party vendor.
Unless stated otherwise, any mention of specific securities or investments is for hypothetical and illustrative purposes only. Adviser’s clients may or may not hold the securities discussed in their portfolios. Adviser makes no representations that any of the securities discussed have been or will be profitable.
Any IPO alerts are purely informational and should not be construed as recommendations to invest.
Adviser is not licensed to provide and does not provide legal, tax or accounting advice to clients. Advice of qualified counsel or accountant should be sought to address any specific situation requiring assistance from such licensed individuals.
Any case studies or hypothetical client profiles are for demonstration purposes only. They illustrate the breadth and depth of the many clients we represent at various life stages. Any similarities to actual Adviser’s clients past or present are strictly coincidental. Individual advice and results will vary based on each client’s circumstances, objectives and prevailing economic conditions.