Client Portals

What If Amazon Enters The Asset Management Business This Year3 min read

Crazy or Crazy Smart?

May 24, 2018 - John Osbon ( 4 mins to read)

John Osbon

Amazon’s entry is not a joke and it could happen soon according to a Vanguard executive who was in town last week for the Vanguard investment confab. Not only that, a number of prominent retailers could launch wealth management offerings as financial advice is scaled even further to reach the smallest investor. Costco and Walmart come to mind. The executive acknowledged that Vanguard is actively planning to compete with technology-driven companies that have never been in wealth management. They take the threat seriously.

Bloomberg, CapGemini and Ant

Bloomberg writes that people would consider using Google and Amazon to manage their wealth. CapGemini’s 2017 World Wealth Report says that more than half of high net worth investors would consider using a Big 4 technology firm for wealth management services. Executives can debate how to enter the wealth management business – from the very top or the very bottom – but it’s clear to me that the big tech operators are coming. Outside the US it’s already happening; China’s Ant Financial manages $350 billion of investments. Ant just completed a $10 billion capital raise valuing the company at $150 billion. There is no current law that prohibits non-US companies from managing US individual money. Switzerland’s UBS has been trying it for years. Clearly, there are big numbers at stake, representing the nest eggs of millions of investors.

Broad trend…

I agree with Vanguard that using technology to continually drive down costs is a great investment strategy and smart business. In 14 short years, Osbon Capital has proactively reduced the underlying investment cost for clients by half. I expect our cost-cutting to continue. In my opinion, the large bank-connected US firms like the one I used to work for are lagging badly and are ripe for picking. The question is, what does all this industry activity mean for me, the wealthy US investor?

Jeff Bezos is not managing your money

If Amazon announces wealth management through its AWS cloud division you can be sure they will not suggest that Jeff Bezos is the portfolio manager. Jeff’s algorithm may get the title, however. The Amazon name is powerful – if not loved by all, at least admired as a company that delivers on time with technology that is always improving. I do think State Street, BlackRock, Vanguard and Fidelity are up to the competitive threat. Most of the competition will center on the $10k to $500k account size. Capturing the $1m -10m individual is much harder since those people want real human beings to talk to and to strategize with.

More pluses than minuses

After assessing the industry changes coming our way Max and I remain focused on keeping Osbon Capital right where it has been since 2005: servicing no more than 100 wealthy families, with equal emphasis on personal attention and cost control through the smart use of technology.

We emphasize language and ideas no tech behemoth algorithm, or even the big sales-driven banks, can replicate. Concepts like “investment journey,” “value proposition,” “tax efficiency,” “trust” and “experience” are best delivered by real people. Add in “trust and estates” and “financial literacy” and you have a better idea of why we exist.

Competition is good for our industry because it gives our clients more choice and forces all providers to work harder. I welcome a conversation with any individual investor in our asset range about these important industry trends.

WEEKLY INSIGHTS
delivered to your inbox

DISCLAIMER

This communication may include forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements (including words such as “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” and “expect”). Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Various factors could cause actual results or performance to differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements.”

“Historical performance is not indicative of future results. The investment return will fluctuate with market conditions.

Past performance is not indicative of any specific investment or future results. Views regarding the economy, securities markets or other specialized areas, like all predictors of future events, cannot be guaranteed to be accurate and may result in economic loss to the investor.

Investment strategies, philosophies, allocations and holdings are subject to change without prior notice.

This communication is intended to provide general information only and should not be construed as an offer of specifically tailored individualized advice.

While the Adviser believes the outside data sources cited to be credible, it has not independently verified the correctness of any of their inputs or calculations and, therefore, does not warranty the accuracy of any third-party sources or information.

Adviser does not endorse the statements, services or performance of any third-party vendor.

Unless stated otherwise, any mention of specific securities or investments is for hypothetical and illustrative purposes only. Adviser’s clients may or may not hold the securities discussed in their portfolios. Adviser makes no representations that any of the securities discussed have been or will be profitable.

Any IPO alerts are purely informational and should not be construed as recommendations to invest.

Adviser is not licensed to provide and does not provide legal, tax or accounting advice to clients. Advice of qualified counsel or accountant should be sought to address any specific situation requiring assistance from such licensed individuals.

Any case studies or hypothetical client profiles are for demonstration purposes only. They illustrate the breadth and depth of the many clients we represent at various life stages. Any similarities to actual Adviser’s clients past or present are strictly coincidental. Individual advice and results will vary based on each client’s circumstances, objectives and prevailing economic conditions.