Briefing: With all of the recent news on Didi, the Chinese version of Uber, it’s a good time to revisit the challenges and opportunities related to investing in Chinese companies. Similar to the US, China is a highly sophisticated global technology leader and many investors have successfully participated in the rise of Alibaba, Tencent, JD, and so on. Investors have had to ignore the quirks of the Chinese investment legal structure, which we’ll cover in more detail. As we enter the age of AI, China is a major contender as a global AI superpower
Last week Chinese ride-hailing company, Didi, raised $4.4 billion via their IPO in the US on the Nasdaq stock exchange. Didi’s scale is massive. According to their S-1, Didi processes 41 million transactions per day and has nearly 500m annual active riders. The Chinese government had previously asked Didi to delay their listing, which obviously did not happen. Citing security concerns, the Chinese Government forced app stores to delist Didi until further notice which has caused the stock price to drop significantly.
Chinese firms have raised roughly $76 billion in the U.S. over the past decade through their IPO process. Last year’s Luckin Coffee IPO turned out to have significant issues with fraudulent accounting which resulted in a roughly -80% drop in the stock price. Also last year, the highly anticipated Ant Financial IPO was blocked by the Chinese government due to speeches made by Jack Ma. Jack had indicated several times leading up to the IPO that Ant Financial was going to significantly disrupt the Chinese banking system, which did not go over well. Investors who want to purchase exposure to companies in China must accept the risk that those companies operate at the discretion of the Chinese government.
Chinese Regulation and Global Ownership
Note that I mentioned above that US investors own “exposure” to Chinese companies, and not shares in the company themselves. By law, foreigners are not allowed to own Chinese companies. When you buy shares in Alibaba, you own shares of a VIE (variable interest entity) headquartered in the Cayman Islands. This loophole often keeps skeptical US investors from investing in Chinese companies, yet it has not stopped Charlie Munger from participating. In our opinion, Munger’s actions are a rough, but fair shortcut for assessing unique inherent risks like this ownership loophole.
While the loophole is now under question following the recent issues with Didi, it does not appear that the loophole will be closed. Closing the loophole for foreign ownership entirely would almost certainly destroy hundreds of billions of economic value, if not trillions, overnight. Investors must trust that the Chinese government does not want to pull the rug out from under US investors.
Investing in Taiwanese companies also comes with China related risks. This is particularly worrying to just about every engineer and tech executive in the world because Taiwan’s TSMC produces roughly 90% of the world’s most advanced semiconductor chips used in GPUs and products like the iPhone. At the same time, China maintains a standing threat of invasion of Taiwan, which would be a disaster for the entire global economy.
AI Superpowers & Computing Power
Growing new hive minds. The UK grocery robotics company, Ocado, released an amazing video recently detailing how their “hive” of robots operates. It’s a short video. With 2,000+ robots in their warehouse, all of the robots are connected to a single “brain” that interacts with inventory and customer requests in real time. Robots can’t interact with their “hive” without sensors, communication boards and many other different types of specialized chips. When we see this video, we see more evidence of the near exponential demand of semiconductors, which makes it an excellent investment theme in our view. Technical innovators like Ocado, which seeks to replace traditional grocery stores and shelved warehouses, are creating the future in real time.
If you’ve followed the narrative of the book AI Super-Powers in the past, you know that the US and China are rapidly advancing their AI capabilities. China has a clear advantage over the US because they are willing to collect any data they want to train their models. To be more specific, China has little to no privacy laws related to collecting data on its citizens. Kai-Fu Lee, the author, argues that access to data sets is the primary driver of AI innovation and eventual market dominance.
Risk v. Reward
Despite the potential for accounting frauds, foreign ownership loophole issues, Chinese government intervention and the threat of invasion of Taiwan, investors today recognize that participating in China’s leading technology companies is a major growth opportunity as well as a classic diversification strategy. There is a clear opportunity for investors to participate in the growth of dominant global technology leaders. It’s up to each investor to decide whether the China-specific risks listed above are more theoretical or practical.
delivered to your inbox
This communication may include forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements (including words such as “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” and “expect”). Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Various factors could cause actual results or performance to differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements.”
“Historical performance is not indicative of future results. The investment return will fluctuate with market conditions.
Past performance is not indicative of any specific investment or future results. Views regarding the economy, securities markets or other specialized areas, like all predictors of future events, cannot be guaranteed to be accurate and may result in economic loss to the investor.
Investment strategies, philosophies, allocations and holdings are subject to change without prior notice.
This communication is intended to provide general information only and should not be construed as an offer of specifically tailored individualized advice.
While the Adviser believes the outside data sources cited to be credible, it has not independently verified the correctness of any of their inputs or calculations and, therefore, does not warranty the accuracy of any third-party sources or information.
Adviser does not endorse the statements, services or performance of any third-party vendor.
Unless stated otherwise, any mention of specific securities or investments is for hypothetical and illustrative purposes only. Adviser’s clients may or may not hold the securities discussed in their portfolios. Adviser makes no representations that any of the securities discussed have been or will be profitable.
Any IPO alerts are purely informational and should not be construed as recommendations to invest.
Adviser is not licensed to provide and does not provide legal, tax or accounting advice to clients. Advice of qualified counsel or accountant should be sought to address any specific situation requiring assistance from such licensed individuals.
Any case studies or hypothetical client profiles are for demonstration purposes only. They illustrate the breadth and depth of the many clients we represent at various life stages. Any similarities to actual Adviser’s clients past or present are strictly coincidental. Individual advice and results will vary based on each client’s circumstances, objectives and prevailing economic conditions.