Fee war in your favor

Print Friendly

Three exchange traded fund (ETF) sponsors – State Street, Vanguard, and BlackRock – control more than 80% of the massive ETF market. Each can claim advantages.  State Street has the two biggest ETFs: SPY and GLD.  BlackRock was first to market, and has the largest market share.  Vanguard has the lowest costs.

All three aspire to a larger market share, and much of the competition comes down to a price war on fees.

Clash of the titans

With more than $1.2 trillion invested in 1258 ETFs (both of these figures have doubled in the last 5 years), competition is fierce in the ETF market. Managers are scurrying to create new funds that track different asset classes, advertising liberally, and seeking to attract more investors by reducing management costs.

 

Source: State Street ETF Snapshot, September 2012

As we have discussed many times, low fees directly benefit investors. Every penny not spent by managers is another penny that can grow in value for shareholders. Vanguard is the consensus champ in the fee arena, averaging 17 basis points across all its ETFs, with many at 10 basis points or less. Just this week it announced it would track different indexes to reduce costs further.

State Street is cost-conscious too. Its SPY fund charged what seemed like a miraculous 20 basis points at its inception in 1993. Now, it’s less than half that at 9.  The lowest expense ETF is Schwab’s U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX), at 4 basis points.  At that level, expenses might as well be zero. It’s all good news for individual investors who keep what sponsors don’t charge.

BlackRock, which has lost a couple points of market share, understands the writing on the wall – reduce fees or lose more share. It’s trimming fees and so is Schwab.

Cut costs anywhere and everywhere

Cost control is one of the most powerful tools available to investors. ETF issuers understand this. Schwab CEO Walt Bettinger was recently quoted in a press release: “In this period of uncertainty in the markets, the expenses investors pay are the only sure thing. As a long-time advocate for investors, we want to offer our clients a truly low-cost way to build a diversified portfolio.”

Based on recent industry activity, there is every reason to believe investors will get more chances to use cost leverage – to their own advantage.

For instance, Vanguard continues to take aim at successful existing ETFs.  On October 10th, Vanguard is expected to debut its 1-5 TIPS bond ETF, at half the management cost of BlackRock’s and Pimco’s.  Investors can vote with their dollars soon thereafter.

[For a very detailed report on the ETF market, we suggest this link from State Street.]

 

For our most popular posts, click here.



This article may include forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements (including words such as “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” and “expect”). Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Various factors could cause actual results or performance to differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements.

Past performance is not indicative of any specific investment or future results.  Views regarding the economy, securities markets or other specialized areas, like all predictors of future events, cannot be guaranteed to be accurate and may result in economic loss to the investor.

Nothing in this article is intended to be or should be construed as individualized investment advice. All content is of a general nature. Individual investors should consult their investment adviser, accountant, and/or attorney for specifically tailored advice.

Any references to third-party data or opinions are listed for informational purposes only and have not been verified for accuracy by the Adviser. Adviser does not endorse the statements, services or performance of any third-party vendor without specifically assessing the suitability of a third-party to a client’s or a prospective client’s needs and objectives.

Specific securities identified and described may or may not be held in portfolios managed by the Adviser and do not represent all of the securities purchased, sold, or recommended for advisory clients.  The reader should not assume that investments in the securities identified and discussed were or will be profitable.   Any securities identified were not selected based on their performance but as an illustrative tool for comparing investments in different market sectors.

 

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!