The US Treasury has been considering issuing 100-year bonds for some time. Based on recent comments by the US Treasury Secretary this may actually happen this year. These are unusual monetary times that allow the government to lower its financing costs. But what are the implications for US individual investors? Do bonds due in 2120 make sense for you?
Current long-term rates in the US
For experienced bond investors the idea of 2% money for 30 years in the US is a staggering idea and sounds like a great deal for our country. Keeping our interest payments low and predictable for extended periods is a big plus, and 100-year bonds would make that easier to accomplish. For all the money the US Treasury currently borrows the weighted average maturity is just six years. Even if we issued more 30-year bonds it would take a massive issuance to raise that average maturity to seven years. Yet another big issuance could bring it to eight years. A significant 100-year issue could push the average maturity out considerably.
The US can borrow money cheaply with any maturity. Yes, the deficit and total amount of debt is high but the cost of servicing it is unbelievably low. Imagine having $5 trillion of 30-year debt at 2%. That is only $100 billion a year of debt service for a long time. Now imagine having $5 trillion (much larger than currently discussed) of 100-year debt at 3%. That is $150 billion of annual debt service well into the next century. I suspect most investors would suggest the US go ahead and issue 100-year bonds; we can afford it and will look back in wonder someday that we could do it.
Risks to us
Critics of the US 100-year bond point to reputational risk if there is weak demand. They also think 100-year bonds will drive up 30-year financing rates. There is no evidence to support either view. We have survived the US credit downgrade intact. There seems to be infinite demand for Treasuries of all types given the alternatives anywhere in the world. Dealers, financial institutions and long-term institutional buyers will get another instrument to build out their businesses and investments.
The 100-year bond is not a new idea. Other countries and companies have used it for a long time. Britain has used it most recently during World War I. In fact, they have even issued “consols” or perpetual bonds that have no maturity. Consols have been issued for 270 years at rates of 2.5-4%. Consols are like forever stamps issued by our US Post Office. Forever stamps can be used forever regardless of the current price of a single stamp. We don’t need to go that far, in my view. One hundred years is far enough and well beyond the view of generational minded investors. Much weaker credits like Austria, Argentina and Mexico have issued 100-year bonds. Even individual companies like Disney and Coke have issued 100-year bonds.
Although it is a great idea for the US – or anyone, really – to issue 100 year bonds, it is not a good idea for individuals to buy them. The risks for individual investors are many and long-lived. Let’s dismiss credit risk since there is none for a US investor in Treasury securities. There is, however, considerable market and inflation risk when locking into a rate for a century. A 3% annual payout would be disastrous if inflation ran at 8-10% for an extended period.
There is just no need to create worry about inflation for your heirs 50-100 years from now. Even if you are very pessimistic long-term about investing, a healthy amount of 10-year Treasury bonds would be plenty.
As always, please call us if you would like to discuss how to structure bond portfolios for your needs. As your interests are quite different than those of bond issuers, it’s important to be a careful and informed investor.
This communication may include forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements (including words such as “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” and “expect”). Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Various factors could cause actual results or performance to differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements.”
“Historical performance is not indicative of future results. The investment return will fluctuate with market conditions.
Past performance is not indicative of any specific investment or future results. Views regarding the economy, securities markets or other specialized areas, like all predictors of future events, cannot be guaranteed to be accurate and may result in economic loss to the investor.
Investment strategies, philosophies, allocations and holdings are subject to change without prior notice.
This communication is intended to provide general information only and should not be construed as an offer of specifically tailored individualized advice.
While the Adviser believes the outside data sources cited to be credible, it has not independently verified the correctness of any of their inputs or calculations and, therefore, does not warranty the accuracy of any third-party sources or information.
Adviser does not endorse the statements, services or performance of any third-party vendor.
Unless stated otherwise, any mention of specific securities or investments is for hypothetical and illustrative purposes only. Adviser’s clients may or may not hold the securities discussed in their portfolios. Adviser makes no representations that any of the securities discussed have been or will be profitable.
Any IPO alerts are purely informational and should not be construed as recommendations to invest.
Any case studies or hypothetical client profiles are for demonstration purposes only. They illustrate the breadth and depth of the many clients we represent at various life stages. Any similarities to actual Adviser’s clients past or present are strictly coincidental. Individual advice and results will vary based on each client’s circumstances, objectives and prevailing economic conditions.