It’s that time of year again – time to update the scoreboard on the million dollar wager Warren Buffett made with Protégé Partners in 2008. It was a ten-year bet, pitting a basket of five hedge funds chosen by Protégé against Buffett’s no-frills pick, Vanguard’s S&P 500 Index fund. There’s just one year left to go. Which side is on top?
Although Mr. Buffett is a highly active investor with his own capital, carefully vetting and buying companies for his holding company Berkshire Hathaway, his advice for individual investors has always been simple and passive: Because you can’t know which stocks will be top performers, own a little bit of everything, reinvest dividends and stay invested for a long time. Accept the long-term market return and watch capitalism do its magic.
An index like the S&P is a great choice for that strategy, providing access to 500 companies in every industry sector across the U.S.
Protégé, on the other hand, has all the fancy short-term investing tools that an index doesn’t – stock picking, market timing, industry weighting, derivatives and short-selling. With so much strategic flexibility, some observers thought Protégé might have the upper hand.
The results say otherwise.
After nine years, the index is up 85 percent, the hedge funds 22 percent. Protégé picked five (unnamed) funds, the best of which is up 63 percent for the duration of the bet; the laggard in the group is up only 3 percent.
On a year-to-year basis, it’s been the same lopsided story. The hedgies won year one, 2008, the first year of the Great Recession (only by losing less than the index). Then Buffett’s side won six years in a row. In 2015, Protégé had a tiny margin of victory.
This past year, the index was up 12 percent compared to one percent for the hedge funds. The rich get richer. That puts the annual scorecard at 7-2, Buffett leading.
One year to go. We don’t predict, and won’t. But the charity of Buffett’s choice that would benefit, Girls Incorporated of Omaha, probably feels pretty good at this point.
Steve Mott – Guest Columnist & Osbon Capital Editor
- This communication may include forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements (including words such as “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” and “expect”). Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Various factors could cause actual results or performance to differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements.”
- “Historical performance is not indicative of future results. The investment return will fluctuate with market conditions.
- Past performance is not indicative of any specific investment or future results. Views regarding the economy, securities markets or other specialized areas, like all predictors of future events, cannot be guaranteed to be accurate and may result in economic loss to the investor.
- Investment strategies, philosophies, allocations and holdings are subject to change without prior notice.
- This communication is intended to provide general information only and should not be construed as an offer of specifically tailored individualized advice.
- While the Adviser believes the outside data sources cited to be credible, it has not independently verified the correctness of any of their inputs or calculations and, therefore, does not warranty the accuracy of any third-party sources or information.
- Adviser does not endorse the statements, services or performance of any third-party vendor.
- Unless stated otherwise, any mention of specific securities or investments is for hypothetical and illustrative purposes only. Adviser’s clients may or may not hold the securities discussed in their portfolios. Adviser makes no representations that any of the securities discussed have been or will be profitable.