Client Portals

Week 40: Finviz Map, Pessimism Is Expensive, Supply & Demand of Stocks5 min read

Oct 6, 2021 - Max Osbon ( 8 mins to read)

Briefing: Based on its popularity, we are highlighting FinViz this week as a very useful tool for investor education. | Skepticism is a really expensive habit and investors should do their best to avoid being skeptics of the space industry. | Over the past 40 years, public companies purchased 8x more equity through M&A and buybacks than they have sold through IPOs or secondaries.

 

Finviz: Performance and relative company sizes

Finviz is a popular market data tool among the financial and investment community. Above is a map of the last 12 months of performance among global stocks that trade in US markets. The size of the square represents the size of the company. For example, Apple (AAPL) is larger than all global major banks combined: JPM, BAC, WFC, etc. This size difference is not always obvious on CNBC – Jamie Dimon gets far more airtime than Tim Cook, for example.

On certain days it can be interesting to watch entire sectors grow in value while others shrink. On other days you might have scattered red and green all over the map. When liquidity leaves the market, you will see the entire map as a big red block, and vice versa.

This dashboard is a helpful way to get to know who the dominant players are in each market and industry sector. Notable leaders are: ASML – #1 in the semiconductor equipment sector, MRNA Moderna – #1 in Biotech as of this year, ACN Accenture – #1 in technology services, and CRM Salesforce – #1 in the software category. For all investors, it’s important to know which top players are leading the pack and which newcomers are likely to dominate in their respective fields in the coming years. Many companies span across sectors, so I wouldn’t take these classifications as gospel. Consider where the growth is likely to come from for the next 1, 3 and 5 years. You may even discover new ways to be highly optimistic about the future in the process.

You can play around with the timeframes and parameters to see different views of the global equities markets: FinViz.com.


Skepticism Is Expensive – the Instagram ‘bubble’ of 2012 and comparisons today

The Pessimist Archive recently shared a great John Stewart video from 2012 about the $1 billion acquisition of the “free photo-sharing app” by Facebook. At the time it was considered an outrage and a worrying sign of a bubble. Today Instagram is worth somewhere around $600 billion, more than Facebook’s own namesake website. It may be the most successful M&A result in history with a whopping 600x return over 9 years at scale.

The Pessimist Archive serves as a helpful reminder that while skepticism may feel more intellectually honest – and sometimes intellectually seductive – it has turned out to be a really expensive habit.

Space is one emergent trend that tends to attract understandable skepticism. Most investors tend to intuitively follow the golden Peter Lynch rule to “invest in what you know.” If that’s the case, then it’s probably as good a time as ever for investors to get more educated on space technology trends.

Rocket manufacturing pioneer Jim Cantrell has pointed out that technology improves dramatically and prices fall when we commit to manufacturing at scale. That scale is just starting to happen now as rocket production ramps up and established companies make public space-related commitments. Honda recently announced plans to manufacture reusable rockets to launch satellites by 2030.

As an exercise, let’s take a look at reusable rockets. The satellite industry’s revenue is growing somewhere between 20-30% per year and is expected to be a $50 billion market by 2025. Satellites provide essential infrastructure in our ultra-connected world. In this case, reusable rockets are a great way to save money on satellite launches. Imagine living in a world with single-use cars that explode after they return to your garage. Each trip would cost $30,000 instead of just the $20 in gas.

The closer you look into the space industry, the less it looks like a billionaire’s hobby (as stated skeptically in the media) and the more it looks like a major leap forward for data and communications systems. If we have these rockets already, they can be used by people as well. A good comparison to space travel might be the Amtrak railroads today. The train tracks between Boston and New York are 85% used by freight and only 15% used by passengers. Once we have regular rocket launches, perhaps 15% of that volume will be used for space tourism as well.


Equity Markets Supply & Demand

Jurrien Timmer (Fidelity Global Macro and all-around expert market data curator) recently pointed out that since 1984, IPO and Secondaries markets have sold (supply) $2.186 trillion of equity to market participants. Over that same period, existing public companies have purchased (demand) a whopping $7.225 trillion in share buybacks and $9.274 trillion in M&A activity. For a fascinating breakdown of the history of M&A at the major tech companies, take a look at this comprehensive analysis of the hundreds of acquisitions that helped Apple, Amazon, Facebook and Google get to where they are today.

Many investors today complain about the lack of profit-sharing for shareholders – mainly they are referring to a frustration of the lack of dividend income. Today’s investors seem to have a bit of an outdated habit of, “don’t touch your principal and aim to live off of the dividends.” The problem is, dividends are not where corporate profits are going as evidenced by the chart above. Too often we see the dividend yield of the S&P 500 quoted somewhere around 1.2% when the total yield with buybacks is closer to 2.25% and sometimes higher. That’s a big difference that gets largely ignored. Buybacks are dramatically more tax-efficient than dividends, but they are often politicized and tend to be a much harder concept for the average investor to understand. The financial media is not helping in this case either.

If you compare the supply side with the demand side, public companies have been net buyers of equity by a factor of 8x over the past 40 years. 8x refers to $2.186 trillion in equity value sold by companies vs $16.5 trillion in equity value purchased. This is a great explanation of why markets are at all time highs today and why the bull market can continue as these companies continue to confidently reinvest in their future and the equity that’s tied to it.

WEEKLY INSIGHTS
delivered to your inbox

DISCLAIMER

This communication may include forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements (including words such as “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “should,” and “expect”). Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Various factors could cause actual results or performance to differ materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements.”

“Historical performance is not indicative of future results. The investment return will fluctuate with market conditions.

Past performance is not indicative of any specific investment or future results. Views regarding the economy, securities markets or other specialized areas, like all predictors of future events, cannot be guaranteed to be accurate and may result in economic loss to the investor.

Investment strategies, philosophies, allocations and holdings are subject to change without prior notice.

This communication is intended to provide general information only and should not be construed as an offer of specifically tailored individualized advice.

While the Adviser believes the outside data sources cited to be credible, it has not independently verified the correctness of any of their inputs or calculations and, therefore, does not warranty the accuracy of any third-party sources or information.

Adviser does not endorse the statements, services or performance of any third-party vendor.

Unless stated otherwise, any mention of specific securities or investments is for hypothetical and illustrative purposes only. Adviser’s clients may or may not hold the securities discussed in their portfolios. Adviser makes no representations that any of the securities discussed have been or will be profitable.

Any IPO alerts are purely informational and should not be construed as recommendations to invest.

Adviser is not licensed to provide and does not provide legal, tax or accounting advice to clients. Advice of qualified counsel or accountant should be sought to address any specific situation requiring assistance from such licensed individuals.

Any case studies or hypothetical client profiles are for demonstration purposes only. They illustrate the breadth and depth of the many clients we represent at various life stages. Any similarities to actual Adviser’s clients past or present are strictly coincidental. Individual advice and results will vary based on each client’s circumstances, objectives and prevailing economic conditions.